Tag Archives: Brazil

Latin America: It’s Not Just About Brazil

A recent article by Boston Consulting Group’s Jorge Becerra and Agustín Costa discusses the economic importance of “The Andean Three” – Chile, Colombia and Peru, countries not often on the radar of the legal community.  But maybe they should be.  While Brazil has been the focus of much of our attention with regards to the Latin American legal market, the combined GDP of these three countries is 65% that of Mexico and is forecast to grow faster than Brazil or Mexico over the next five years. 

There are many reasons for this, report Becerra and Costa, including rising foreign direct investment.  The Andean Three are also increasingly being viewed as “a new driver of regional dynamism.”  They have free trade and investment agreements and last year merged their stock exchanges to create a central bourse, the Integrated Latin American Market (MILA).  The MILA has Latin America’s second largest market capitalization after Brazil’s Bovespa, as well as the largest number of listed companies.  All three countries have market-friendly democracies that favor investment and free trade and they share strong trade links with the growing economies of Asia.  Total trade with Asia amounts to about 10% of the combined GDP of the three nations – about twice as much as the other large economies in Latin America.

Last fall, Colombia’s Free Trade Agreement with the United States was finally approved by the US Congress and is set to take effect next month.  The International Trade Commission estimates that the tariff reductions in the Agreement will expand exports of U.S. goods alone by more than $1.1 billion. 

Peru’s economy has expanded by an average of 5.6% annually over the past five years; for Chile the rate was 5.1% and in Colombia the rate was 4.6%.  Cross-border mergers and acquisitions within the bloc averaged 40 per year from 2007 to 2010, more than double the average from 2003 to 2006. Competition policies and tax rates are also business-friendly, contributing to the attractive environment for investors, especially those in the energy and mining sectors.

Legal Market

Despite the growing importance of the Andean Three in the global economy, international firms have only just begun to enter the local markets.

Major international law firms have a rather small footprint in Colombia, with Baker & McKenzie and Norton Rose being the most visible players.  Baker & McKenzie has offices in Chile and Colombia and Norton Rose, thanks to its merger in January with Canada’s Macleod Dixon, has an office in Bogotá, Colombia.  Macleod Dixon opened the office in 2010 prompted by major new investments in Colombia, including the acquisition by Ecopetrol, the Colombian state oil company, and Calgary’s Talisman of BP’s Colombian subsidiary. In February, Holland & Knight announced its intent to open a new office in Bogotá, which would make it only the second major U.S.-based law firm to have an office in Colombia.   The office, which is expected to open this month, will advise non-Colombian companies that wish to enter the Colombian market as well as Colombian enterprises looking to expand abroad.

In Chile, international firms have also not generally established a presence on the ground.  A number of the leading Spanish firms, for example – including Uría & Menéndez, Garrigues, and Cuatrecasas – have established links to local firms in the country.  An exception is Baker & McKenzie, whose local firm, Cruzat Ortúzar & Mackenna, is a member of Baker & McKenzie International, a Swiss Verein.  But increased interest by foreign investors in the region’s natural resources and demand for power has involved local firms as well as international players in significant transactions.  Chile’s largest local firm, Carey y Cia, recently worked with Australian firm Freehills to advise Origin Energy Ltd. regarding its acquisition of 51% of Xstrata Copper’s hydroelectric project developer in Chile, Energia Austral.  Origin will initially invest $75 million in project development costs and potentially a further $75 million toward a final investment decision.

In Peru’s small legal market, national firm Muñiz Ramírez is the market leader. And while the market does not attract a significant amount of attention from international firms, there are exceptions.  Squire Sanders, for example, in addition to its offices in Rio de Janeiro and the Dominican Republic, has an extensive network of independent local and regional firms across Latin America, including Peru (and also Chile, Colombia and a number of other countries).

As investors consider their strategies in the region, Becerra and Costa offer these guidelines:

  • Take advantage of the Andean Three’s economic integration. At the same time, companies should keep in mind that there are still differences among Chile, Colombia, and Peru . . . whether a company is analyzing the case for investing in Colombia, Chile, or Peru, it should take into account the potential to expand into one or both of the other two nations.  
  • Approach the Andean Three differently from other Latin American markets . . . the open business environment of the three Andean nations increasingly resembles that of developed nations.
  • Take advantage of the growing linkages between the Andean Three and Asia . . . Chile, Colombia, and Peru should occupy a privileged spot on the agenda of any truly global company with a clear action plan for the region.

For those law firms crafting a new or expanded strategy for Latin America, this is good advice as well.

Posted by Marianne Purzycki

Strict Rules on International Law Firms in Brazil Likely to Remain in Place

Last November we covered a story that Latin Lawyer (subscription required) was reporting on regarding the decision by the Brazilian Bar Association (OAB) to maintain Brazil’s strict regulations against any type of formal alliance with international firms.  The OAB then charged its Federal Council with forming a commission to help clarify the rules.

This week, Latin Lawyer has again provided another update that indicates that these regulations will continue to remain in place.  Issued on Tuesday, the draft rule would:

[P]rohibit many habits and structures currently in place in existing associations in Brazil, and rigorously enforce total physical, financial, administrative, and promotional separation between local and international firms. Foreigners found breaking the rules would lose their Brazilian licence; non-compliant Brazilians would face OAB disciplinary proceedings, with administrative, civil and even criminal penalties.

If passed, firms would no longer be permitted to use phrases such as “associated with” or “in cooperation with,” joint communications would be prohibited, and the sharing of back office functions would also not be allowed.  All Brazilian firms associated with international firms would be required to register with their local bar and any international lawyer found to be in breach of the rules could have their license revoked as a foreign legal consultant.

The OAB’s Commission on International Relations will vote on the new rule by March, when it will go to the National Council of the OAB.

Posted by Marianne Purzycki

Update on Brazil: Protectionism Gains Favor

Last month we wrote about the importance of Brazil to many international law firms and why the country has much to offer these firms and their corporate clients.  We also discussed challenges in the Brazilian market, in particular, the limitations on foreign firms preventing them from practicing locally, which is why many firms have entered the market through an association with a Brazilian law firm.  These types of associations might now be in jeopardy according to a recent vote by the Brazilian Bar Association (OAB).

Latin Lawyer (subscription required), is reporting that at the OAB national conference last week, “Brazilian lawyers have voted in favour of maintaining the strict regulation against any type of formal alliance with international firms.”  Three motions passed unanimously in favor of the strict interpretation of the OAB rule which regulates international associations. 

 [The] three motions were: that according to Brazilian rules, it is not permitted to have any type of association between individual lawyers or law firms, and consultants or groups of consultants in foreign law; that looser partnerships between local and international lawyers, to share experience and to serve clients within a global context, are permitted; and that also allowed are associations which are scientific or cultural in nature.

According to the rules of the conference, the OAB’s Federal Council must now form a commission to consider the motions passed.  The OAB will meet in December, according to Cezar Britto, the president of the OAB’s Commission on International Relations, “to regulate and discipline existing cross-border associations, and to give more clarity to the rules.”

 Posted by Marianne Purzycki

Brazil Nuts: Why Law Firms are Flocking to Sao Paulo

Throughout the next few weeks, we will be taking a closer look at certain emerging markets and their impact on the global legal industry.  Today our focus is on Brazil, but stay tuned for a discussion of why some are calling this the “Asian Century” on Friday.

The Influx of Firms

Although much of the focus in recent years has been on emerging markets in Asia, Brazil has been quietly claiming an important role in many law firm strategies.  The global economic downturn has only hastened this development, as large international firms have looked to developing countries as a key source of future business in the global market.

In 2011 alone, Dewey & LeBoeuf, Jones Day, Cleary Gottlieb and Davis Polk have announced new offices in Sao Paulo.  The CMS law firm network has announced interest in adding a member in Brazil (the UK member, CMS Cameron McKenna, already has an office in Rio de Janeiro focused on the oil and gas industry).  European players including French firm Fidal, German firm Heuking Kuhn Luer Wojtek, and UK firms Kennedys, Taylor Wessing and Harneys have also begun expanding into Brazil.  Fidal, Heuking and Kennedys are all setting up associations with local firms, while Taylor Wessing has launched a Brazil group based out of its London and Hamburg offices.  And Harneys has hired a Brazilian lawyer, Maria Pia Buchi, to serve as head of business development in Sao Paulo and Rio.

These new entrants join a longer list of international firms that have focused on Brazil as a burgeoning market in recent years, including Allen & Overy, Baker & McKenzie, Chadbourne & Parke, DLA Piper, Linklaters, Mayer Brown, Macleod Dixon, Proskauer Rose, Shearman & Sterling, Skadden, White & Case, Squire Sanders, Simpson Thacher, and Gibson Dunn.  Most of these firms have opened offices or created associations with firms in Sao Paulo, the country’s largest city, though both Rio and the capitol, Brasilia, have also garnered attention.

Brazil is clearly a hot spot for law firms, but what specifically does the country offer law firms and their corporate clients? Continue reading