Tag Archives: Dissolution

Awareness Is the Key to Avoiding Firm Failures

Law firm failures are rarely caused by any one thing, according John Cussons, director at Huron Legal. In fact, he says that it’s a combination of three interlinked factors that often brings firms down, namely: lack of a clear strategic plan, financial mismanagement, and failure to retain key people.

Failures, he explains, can be divided into two categories: the catastrophic ones that get all the press and the failure of firms to compete in their marketplace. To Cussons, it’s the second type of failure—the failure to compete—that firms must guard against, as it can be the forerunner to catastrophic failure.

“With catastrophic failures, what’s often reported is financial mismanagement,” Cussons says. “But if you go far enough back, you can see that it’s actually a combination of both financial and strategic mismanagement.”

It’s this combination of financial and strategic mismanagement that causes the loss of key people, which is what causes firms to unravel. “The partners begin to leave in droves, and it becomes unsustainable,” says Cussons.

So what can you do? Develop clear strategic and a financial plans.

Strategically, you need to be aware of where you are now in the market and to agree about where you want to go. Define the clients you want to serve, what you want to do for them and at what level. That may sound easy, but Cussons says that many of the firms he consults for have a distorted view of their current place in the market, which is further impacted by a partnership often unable to agree on its market standing and therefore unable to decide on how to change to achieve their desired future position.

“You’ve got to decide where you want to get to, and you’ve got to be clear about where you are now,” Cussons says.

Financially, you need to ensure your firm is managing its ongoing profitability correctly, he says, noting that many firms don’t link profitability to performance. This is a very critical issue that many firms simply don’t get right.

“That’s what has let a lot of firms down, I think,” he says. “Many partners in firms all over the world don’t truly understand how they make profits. They understand it conceptually, but they don’t understand which levers to pull to improve profitability at matter and practice level…. [But], to be fair to the majority of partners, business skills such as profitability management were not part of their training.”

Only once you have the strategic and financial elements in place can you be truly competitive in your market. You then need to create an internal structure that supports your overall business plan.

“In the case of both strategy and financial management it’s about awareness,” he says. “You need data, you need good reporting, you need a management team and partners who really understand what they need to be looking for, both in the strategic sense and in the financial sense. And then you need a management and leadership team and an organizational structure that actually allows the firm to react to changes in the market or the firm’s circumstances.”

Want to know more? Cussons further explores the causes of law firm failures in the West LegalEdcenter webinar “Why Firms Fail: Identifying Early Warning Signs Based On Past Law Firm Failures” and how to avoid financial failure in “Delivering Financial Success: The Importance of Managing Profitability and the Role of Legal Project Management.”

Dissolution Imminent? How to Handle it Well

Sometimes law firms fail. Sometimes it’s due to economic factors, but more often it’s because “law firms are fragile organizations that are held together by the will of the partners,” according to Michael D. Short in a LawVision post “Advice for Law Firms in Serious Trouble.”

“Many firms,” Short writes, “are one or two key defections away from the start of a downward spiral in confidence that can quickly pull any law firm apart.”

What can firms do in the face of imminent failure? There are three options, according to Short:

  1. A rapid, radical restructuring.
  2. A “savior acquirer” law firm that absorbs your firm into theirs.
  3. Dissolution.

While option No. 2 is cited as the “path of least resistance,” neither it nor restructuring may be possible. Dissolution, therefore, remains the only option. Once a firm has decided to wind down, Short says that it’s best to do it quickly, without declaring bankruptcy (if possible) and permanently.

Yann Geron, a partner at Fox Rothschild LLP who co-authored the LawVision article, offered further advice on how to proactively manage the dissolution and maintain credibility with creditors, avoid a leadership vacuum and successfully transition clients to new firms as the billing partners move those firms.

Read the full article here.

Judge approves Dewey & LeBoeuf settlement just 5 months after collapse

While few in the legal industry were surprised by the Chapter 11 filing by Dewey & LeBoeuf in May of this year, many were shocked that a firm of such size and stature could unravel at such speed.

It seems that the bankruptcy proceedings are continuing at a similar pace. This week it was announced by Thomson Reuter’s News & Insights that a $71.5 million settlement between former Dewey & LeBoeuf’s partners and the law firm’s estate has been approved by the bankruptcy judge in charge of the case. The decision comes less than five months after the firm’s dissolution, and provides creditors, who are owed in the vicinity of $500 million, their first and largest recovery in the bankruptcy so far.

It has been estimated that more than 400 of the 670 former partners have so far opted to participate in the settlement, which requires former partners to pay portions of their compensation from 2011 and 2012. In exchange, partners who opted in are released from future liability and litigation over debts. Individual payments reportedly ranged from $5,000 to $3.5 million.

Bankruptcy judge Martin Glenn concluded the settlement was in the best interests of both the estate and its creditors by avoiding years of potential litigation between Dewey’s estate and former partners. He concluded the settlement ultimately “will lead to a quicker wind-down in Chapter 11, and – more importantly – a quicker and more certain distribution to creditors.”

Glenn also rejected a request from a group of retirees and former partners from legacy firm LeBoeuf Lamb Greene & MacRae who opposed the settlement on the grounds that it favoured higher paid partners. Judge Glenn adjudicated that the settlement was independently negotiated with no evidence of one particular party favored over another.

Dewey’s wind-down team now hopes that the judge’s decision will prompt other partners who have yet to accept the settlement to reconsider. The team has offered to waive a late penalty fee for partners who now decide to opt in.

Details of the settlement revealed top contributors include corporate partner Berge Setrakian (who agreed to pay $3.5 million), Washington, D.C.-based white-collar defense rainmaker Ralph Ferrara ($3.36 million), and Mort Pierce, Dewey Ballantine’s former chairman ($1.02 million).

However, the firm’s senior management team – Chairman Steven Davis, executive director Stephen DiCarmine, and former chief financial officer Joel Sanders, were not allowed to participate in the settlement. According to reports by Legal Week, the Dewey estate may pursue claims against them.

The settlement also does not include an estimated $60 million of revenue and work in progress that former partners took with them to new firms at the time of, or prior dissolution, which trustees may seek to recover.

To access a full copy of Tuesday’s ruling by Judge Martin Glenn please follow this link. The final details of Dewey & LeBoeuf’s Chapter 11 reorganisation are scheduled to be decided in November.

Posted by Tricia Pelton

Dewey’s Demise: Where Have All The Partners Gone?

The news that Dewey & LeBoeuf filed for bankruptcy on Monday came as little surprise to most in the legal industry. The firm has teetered on the brink of collapse for a number of months in the wake of mass partner defections, which have been occurring at an increasing pace since the start of the year. Many market commentators are tracking these defections*, and they paint an interesting picture of how quickly partner exits can take hold within a faltering law firm, becoming a vicious cycle that can be almost impossible to contain.

This illustrates a unique quality of professional partnerships: law firm assets remain largely and inextricably tied to partners’ books of business. In fact, Albert Togut, Dewey’s bankruptcy attorney, produced one of the quotes of the week when he explained that “Our assets went home every night…until one night, they went home and never came back.” Once a critical mass of partners defected, the firm’s ability to meet revenue generation requirements, and to pay partners and its debt obligations, was severely hampered, leading to further defections, and its ultimate demise.

Where did they all go?
Our post earlier in the week discussed the negative impact that the Chapter 11 filing is likely to have on clients, as well as the financial implications it will have on the raft of unsecured creditors. However, a number of law firms around the globe are benefiting from the largest dissolution in law firm history. The largest benefactors in the U.S. have included:

  • Winston & Strawn, which has taken on as many as twenty two litigation partners, predominantly in New York, but also adding strengths in Chicago, Los Angeles and Washington DC.
  • DLA Piper so far has announced the addition of twleve U.S. partners across an array of practice areas including corporate, project finance, litigation and IP. Most will join the New York office, but the group also includes a West Coast-based partner and an addition in Washington DC.
  • Proskauer Rose has added eleven partners in New York and Washington DC focused on bankruptcy & restructuring and securities litigation (the bankruptcy team also included two London-based partners).
  • Willkie Farr & Gallagher took on the much lauded corporate and regulatory insurance practice, a legacy LeBoeuf Lamb practice in New York in March (this team also included two partners in London).

The break-up of Dewey & LeBoeuf’s international network has also provided the basis for international growth and expansion of a number of U.S. firms. It has allowed four firms to launch new international offices, while numerous others have strengthened their international capabilities, as they added Dewey incumbents. A round up of the international moves includes:

  • In London, Morgan Lewis has been the biggest benefactor, taking on up to seven corporate and litigation partners. The firm has also taken on the majority of the Russia & CIS practice based in Moscow and Almaty.
  • Dechert has been another recipient of a large part of Dewey’s international network. The firm has taken on a three-partner corporate team in London, as well as the Dubai and Tbilisi offices (to launch new offerings in the UAE and Georgia respectively).
  • The fifty-lawyer Polish office has moved to Greenberg Traurig, allowing a launch in Eastern Europe for Greenberg.
  • The Italian arm opted out of the U.S. LLP in May to operate as a stand-alone outfit. It has joined forces with ex-Clifford Chance corporate partner, Vittorio Grimaldi, to rebrand as Grimaldi Studio Legale.
  • In Germany, the Frankfurt office has been split between McDermott Will & Emery (to launch a new Frankfurt office for the firm) and U.K. firm, Simmons & Simmons; while DLA Piper and SJ Berwin have also picked up individual partners.
  • In Asia, the three-partner Hong Kong office has joined DLA Piper.
  • Finally, in Africa, Baker & McKenzie this week announced that it was launching a new office in Johannesburg focused on projects, energy and mining sectors after taking on Dewey’s South African-based operations.

Partner Moves by Region

*These include AmLaw Daily, 3 Geeks and a Law Blog, and Law Shucks

Posted by Tricia Pelton