Tag Archives: Dodd-Frank

Survey Reports Majority Would Report Wrongdoing

In an interesting follow-on to a piece that we wrote last week on whistleblowers, a new Ethics & Action Survey commissioned by plaintiff litigation firm Labaton Sucharow reports that 34% of survey respondents are aware of misconduct in the workplace and 78% would report the wrongdoing if it could be done “anonymously, without retaliation, and result in a monetary award.”  Conducted by ORC International between November 17-20, the survey questioned 1,000 Americans. 

As we mentioned in our post last week, the new whistleblower provisions in the Dodd-Frank act provide strong protection to employees who report the fraud directly to the SEC and provide monetary awards to eligible individuals of up to 30% of the money collected in an enforcement action in which over $1,000,000 in sanctions is ordered.

And while it was only in August that these new provisions kicked in, the SEC quickly recorded an impressive number of tips (well over 300) in just seven short weeks.  So while the Survey reported that an overwhelming majority (79%) would encourage a loved one to report wrongdoing, other findings reveal differences among gender, income, educational levels, and regions of the country.

  • Women were only slightly more inclined than men to encourage a loved one to come forward (82% versus 75%). 
  • In terms of income, while 49% of respondents with annual household income between $75,000-$100,000 reported that they had knowledge of, or had observed misconduct, the percentage dropped to 29% for those respondents with a household income above $100,000. 
  • While 29% of high school graduates had knowledge of wrongdoing, that figure rose to 42% for those with some level of college education.
  • Of respondents living in the Northeastern US, 29% have observed or have direct knowledge of misconduct in their workplace while in the Western US, the number increases to 37%.   In US metro areas, the number is 32% compared to 41% of respondents living in non-metro areas.

Posted by Marianne Purzycki

2012: Year of the Whistleblower?

According to data from the Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, fraud in companies is more likely to be discovered by tips (40%), than any other detection method.  And while it was only in August that the new whistleblower provisions in the Dodd-Frank Act took effect, the SEC quickly recorded 334 whistleblower tips in just seven weeks of the program for fiscal year 2011, which ended September 30. The most common complaints were market manipulation (16.2%), offering fraud (15.6%) and corporate disclosures and financial statements (15.3%).  Submissions came from individuals in 37 states, with the highest number coming from California (34), New York (24), and Florida (19) as well as from foreign countries, including China (10) and the United Kingdom (9). 

So it is no wonder that a number of market commentators are predicting that 2012 might just become “the year of the whistleblower” and that perhaps whistleblowing will become a “global industry.”  Thanks to the global economic crisis, some predict that countries will strengthen protection for whistleblowers and governments, mindful of misuse of public dollars, will devote more resources to rooting out fraud in public programs and military spending. 

The SEC’s Office of the Whistleblower administers its whistleblower program and while the rules encourage internal reporting, they also provide strong protection to employees who want to report the fraud directly to the SEC.  The Commission is authorized to provide monetary awards of up to 30% of the money collected, to eligible individuals who come forward with tips that lead to a Commission enforcement action in which over $1,000,000 in sanctions is ordered.

The SEC also reported in November that its past fiscal year saw the agency file a record 735 enforcement actions, including many cases of insider trading as well as those related to the financial crisis, often involving highly complex market practices and products. 

And while the DOJ has not released fiscal year 2011 data for False Claims Act activity, in 2010 the DOJ recovered $3 billion in civil settlements and judgments, including a record $2.5 billion health care fraud recovery.  Most of the cases resulting in recoveries were brought by whistleblowers under the False Claims Act’s qui tam provisions, and they are entitled to recover between 15 and 30 percent of the proceeds of a successful suit.  Recoveries since 1986, when Congress substantially strengthened the civil False Claims Act, now total more than $27 billion. Recoveries in qui tam cases have exceeded $18 billion, and whistleblowers have obtained more than $2.8 billion in awards.

So what do the new SEC whistleblower provisions mean for in-house attorneys?  Corporate Counsel magazine recently interviewed Paul Leder, a partner at Richards Kibbe & Orbe, who specializes in securities compliance and enforcement, and previously served as a deputy director at the SEC.  According to Leder:

A key issue for companies in 2012 is going to continue to be the enhanced whistleblower provisions that the SEC now administers. And the reason for that is twofold. One is that companies need to focus on their internal mechanisms for dealing with whistleblowers to encourage internal reporting at the earliest possible stages. In those cases where they receive a complaint, they need to be prepared to deal with that in a timely and credible fashion. The other piece . . . is that whistleblowers would be likely to make allegations related to financial fraud issues and illicit payments. Whistleblowers may believe, rightly or wrongly, that they have insights into the company’s activities in these areas that might point to potential misconduct.

Leder further explains that companies must develop a culture that encourages internal reporting, and the message needs to be clearly communicated and re-communicated by all levels of management. Companies must also have a mechanism, such as a hotline or an ombudsperson, to receive the complaints, and then finally, the complaints must be acted upon in a timely and effective manner, so it is apparent to employees that they have been heard and are being taken seriously.

Posted by Marianne Purzycki

The Dodd-Frank Act: A “gold mine” for law firms?

Since the passage of the Dodd-Frank Act more than a year ago, a host of companies and law firms have reaped huge profits by helping Wall Street banks navigate the new law’s provisions.   And while this kind of activity has been seen in the past, notably with the passage of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act in the 1970s and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act in 2002, the Dodd-Frank Act is quickly becoming a “gold mine” for lawyers, corporate accountants, financial accountants, technology vendors, risk management advisers, and turnaround companies.

Debevoise & Plimpton, for example, billed around $100,000 for a 17-page letter on one of Dodd-Frank’s regulations regarding “risky banking,” according to a recent story in the New York Times.

 “It is a full-employment act,” said Gregory J. Lyons, a partner at Debevoise, where a team of a half-dozen lawyers has drafted 30-plus comment letters in the last six months.

“The law is passed, but we are still reasonably early in the process,” Mr. Lyons said. “There is still a lot to be written.”

The most lucrative part of the act, however, might turn out to be the requirement that large financial institutions draw up emergency plans to wind themselves down  in the event of an impending collapse (such plans are often called “living wills”).  Legal giants like Clifford Chance, accounting firms like Deloitte, and even restructuring boutiques, are all vying for a share of the living will pie.  Earlier this summer Barclays said that it has spent $48 million on outside advisers and in-house staff to draft its living will.

While no one has totaled up all the costs of complying with Dodd-Frank, estimates put the amount in the billions of dollars.  What’s more, in the case of the living wills, most global corporations will need to have several versions to satisfy the rules of different national regulators.  That could mean a lot of business opportunities now and into the foreseeable future.

by Marianne Purzycki