Tag Archives: LinkedIn

Law Firm Websites and Beyond: How to Win and Retain Business

It’s hard to believe that the first law firm website was launched less than twenty years ago.  According to a recent blog post by Robert Ambrogi, it was Venable, which launched the first law firm website in March 1994. Considered cutting edge at the time, law firm websites have since been joined by wikis, extranets, blogs and other forms of social media as part of the business development toolkit of large law firms.  A recent report from Hubbard One (a Thomson Reuters business), Building Relationships with Global General Counsel, highlights the continuing importance of law firm websites as well as the use of newer social media tools.

The survey consisted of interviews with 40 General Counsel (GCs) worldwide.  Ninety percent of the respondents were from US-based companies, two-thirds of which have international operations.  Eight percent of the respondents were based in Europe and almost all respondents (95%) work in large private or public companies with annual revenues greater than US$500 million.

Not surprisingly, the two main factors that GCs say are important when selecting a law firm are the experience of the firm’s attorneys (33%) and the firm’s expert knowledge of the company’s sector or industry (31%).  These two factors far outweigh competitive and/or flexible pricing (16%), not to mention brand reputation (9%) and efficiency/legal project management (7%).

Websites

There are numerous channels that allow firms to showcase their expertise including proposals, websites, newsletters and e-mail alerts.  While the survey found that many GCs relied on proposals to assess the suitability of firms for a project when there was no clear choice of a firm to work with, websites are still important tools that GCs use to help them select firms. 

Many interviewed GCs indicated that they visit the website of law firms they are considering working with once or twice per month. Though these visits may be as short and practical as looking at an attorney’s biography or finding relevant contact information, they leave a deep impression on the visitor. It is crucial that law firms have an up-to-date website with a constant stream of relevant and original material that is easy to access.

The survey also noted that clear and usable navigation (34%), relevant and valuable content (31%), and quick and easy searches (29%) were equally important for busy GCs.  Of lesser value were interactive user experiences (2%) and visually attractive design (1%).  As one GC interviewed said about the problem with poorly designed websites:

 “Too much junk. No effective search. Just tell us who you are, where you are, who your lawyers are and what you’re really good at. The rest of the fluffy stuff is superfluous and should not clutter navigation bars, front pages or make it more difficult to find the important content.”

While GCs may not want a website that is too flashy, that doesn’t mean that they don’t appreciate an up-to-date appearance.  Branding and having a modern look are important, too. 

Larger, often more corporate law firms have understood that “brand is as important [to them], as it is to Procter & Gamble, Nestle or anybody else.” Yet in other cases, GCs regularly see the type of “website [that] looks like it was made in 2005 and not appropriate for high-resolution modern screens,” which “just looks like they’re on the cheap side.”

In terms of the most often viewed sections of a firm website, survey respondents spent the most time looking at lawyer and staff profiles (combined score of 40%), followed by practice areas and service offerings (22%).  GCs pay close attention to lawyer profiles, looking at a lawyer’s personal experience or prior legal work (combined score of 55%), their list of clients (21%), and what school they attended (11%).

E-Mail Alerts, Briefings, Whitepapers, Social Media

Beyond websites, GCs find that the most useful ways to receive information from law firms is from email alerts (33%), industry briefings/seminars (25%), industry reports/whitepapers (18%), and webinars (16%).  Similar to websites, these communication channels are only useful to GCs when they are highly focused to meet a particular need.  Extranets/portals, blogs and video, according to the survey, were underutilized but may become more important over time as GCs become more comfortable with these tools.

When it comes to sourcing information about or from law firms, blogs (35%) and LinkedIn (26%) are the most popular means used by interviewed GCs.  Podcasts and video are used by 11% of GCs, while YouTube, Twitter, Facebook, Flickr and SlideShare have limited appeal.  More than two-thirds of respondents find “law firm engagement in social media ‘not very valuable,’ and a quarter ‘not valuable at all,’” indicating that firms might not be engaging correctly with social media.  Firms appear to be slowly embracing the medium’s interactive nature, a topic that was covered in our interviews last month with lawyer Dan Goldman of the Mayo Clinic and Sarah Feingold, general counsel at Etsy.  One GC who responded to the survey commented:

 [Firms are] treating it as “an adjunct to their normal marketing strategy.” He explains: “So, if they win an award, they’ll tweet about it or put it on LinkedIn. But the interactive nature of social media which is supposed to make it what it is, no, I do not think that they have grasped the proper way to use it.”

The Future

Looking towards the future, GCs were asked what trends they thought would impact how they select, communicate and collaborate with law firms in the next three years.  Relationship automation (e-billing being the most common form) was ranked as the top development, with cloud computing and online work collaboration in second place, and web intelligence (data analytics) in third.

Law firms are under heightened pressure to set themselves apart from competitors in order to improve their chances of winning work and retaining clients.  GCs are increasingly expecting law firms to provide them with highly relevant information on a timely basis, using many different communication channels.  Successful firms will not only provide targeted content on websites and via email alerts and newsletters, but will also be comfortable as an active participant on other social media platforms.

Posted by Marianne Purzycki

Legal IT Vendors Embracing Social Media

Earlier this week we discussed how the proliferation of mobile technology is impacting the legal industry.  A recent post from The Orange Rag, a UK blog about legal technology, details how legal IT vendors are incorporating social media.  Among the more intriguing new offerings:

  • Peppermint Technology is embedding Twitter streams in client and prospective client records, which allows law firms to track a client’s tweets alongside news and other aggregated data.
  • Online conveyancing firm 1st Property Lawyers has signed on with Feefo, a platform for online feedback.  Feefo enables the firm’s customers to post ratings and reviews of their experience the way diners might review a new restaurant on Yelp.
  • Eclipse Legal System is incorporating Twitter, LinkedIn and Facebook into its Proclaim Case Management system.  Users can now access news and Twitter feeds, revise LinkedIn profiles, and post status updates to Facebook, all  from within Proclaim.

As the legal industry continues to embrace new technologies, it is likely more legal vendors will begin incorporating social media and mobile technologies into their products.

Social Media Forum: Content is King

Last week, the Hildebrandt Institute and West LegalEdCenter hosted our Social Media Forum in New York City.  The goal of the event was to step beyond the basics of social media at law firms, and discuss how lawyers and firms can harness social media to help drive their business and better serve their clients.

Keynote speaker Peter Shankman kicked things off on an inspiring note, discussing his extensive experience with using social media and business.  According to Shankman, if your social media efforts are not bringing in revenue, “you’re doing it wrong.”  This is an important message for law firms, many of which are still apprehensive about social media and may question how it can enhance their business.  Shankman went on to explain that as has always been the case, it is the firm’s services that matter most.  Tools like Twitter, blogging and LinkedIn are just that – tools that can help firms better communicate with their clients and potential clients.

This message was echoed throughout the day, as panelists and attendees discussed how best to integrate social media into their firm’s overall strategy.  Again and again, the conversation came back to the idea of social media as a tool – content and quality should remain paramount.  Although the day was full of strong analysis, several moments stood out.

In the first panel of the day, event co-chair Jasmine Trillos-Decarie, the Director of Marketing and Business Development for Foley Hoag, noted that social media can be a “great equalizer” for small firms.  Tools like Twitter and LinkedIn have been fully embraced by many in the business community, which means that attorneys trying to open up a line of communication now have new methods at their disposal.

Panelist Jeff Ifrah of Ifrah Law is an example of Trillos-Decarie’s words brought to life.  A veteran of large law firms, Ifrah used blogging to help build the brand and reputation of his own firm when he went started his own firm.  The firm’s blogs (Crime in the Suites, focusing on white collar issues, and FTC Beat) provide firm attorneys with an opportunity to demonstrate their expertise.  The blogs have worked as business development tools, in one case helping bring in a client simply by showing up in the right Google search results.

Ifrah spoke on a panel about creating a blogging culture within a law firm, moderated by event co-chair and author Adrian Dayton.  Dayton expounded on the example Ifrah sets, observing that blogging is a good way to showcase a firm’s “product”: its lawyers.  Later on, Adam Stock (Director of Marketing and Business Development at Allen Matkins Leck Mallor & Natsis) and Aden Dauchess (Director of Digital Marketing at Womble Carlyle) demonstrated how video can be used to help sell that product, through both substantive informational videos and more marketing-focused clips.

And finally, my favorite moment of the day involved a young lawyer using social media to do what lawyers have always done.    Amy Knapp of Knapp Marketing relayed the story of Ram Sunkara, an associate at Sutherland Asbill.  Sunkara used his own contacts on LinkedIn, which initially consisted primarily of old classmates, to begin building a network of contacts that he eventually developed into a thriving landfill gas practice.  Although LinkedIn is often derided as the least dynamic of this generation of social networking sites, it apparently has more potential than some people think.  Sunkara’s success is the result not of the magical powers of LinkedIn, but of his own ingenuity and diligence in using the site to do some old school networking.

Thanks to these moments and all of the other great contributions from the moderators, panelists and attendees, the Forum offered a real education in how social media can be used to augment the work of attorneys and firms in serving their clients.  While the method of communication matters (no one sends client alerts via telegram, after all), at the end of the day, content is king.

Posted by Emily Fisher